Skip to main content

The New Toyota

Apple has finally "jumped the shark." For those of you who aren't familiar with the idiom, it was originally coined in response to an episode of Happy Days when Fonzie jumps over a shark to prove his courage. Critics and viewers alike consider this point in the show's history to be the beginning of its decline. In general, the idiom is used to describe a moment of downturn for a previously successful enterprise.

In my opinion, Apple is close to reaching that point if it hasn't already. Granted, Steve Jobs and Company have never been in the majority in terms of market share, but they've always had a rabidly fanatical following. Still, when you call your user community a bunch of idiots and fail to acknowledge that the real problem lies with your untouchable product then you start to sow the seeds of your own ruin.

And this is exactly what has happened. CNN recently reported that Apple's response to users' complaints about cell phone reception quality (or the lack thereof) is to not hold the phone a certain way. Due to the fact that the antenna is wrapped around the outer edge of the case, Apple claims that people holding the phone with their hands wrapped around a specific corner are going to cause significant deterioration in signal strength. But (!), they continue, there is also a software bug that displays bars indicating that the strength is higher than it really is. So we'll fix that and you, Mr. User, should avoid holding the phone with anything other than a part of plastic tongs that grip the phone like Thetis did to Achilles when she dipped him in the River Styx.

User: Dr. Jobs, my phone doesn't work when I do this.
Dr. Jobs: don't do that then.

Let's be clear: I'm not predicting the eventual filing of bankruptcy by Apple. They will never go away. Historically they've done not much more than have ebbs and flows of popularity. These are sometimes severe, but that's all that's ever really happened to them. You can confirm this by looking at their 5 year stock chart.

But when a company that was hitherto considered untouchable due to the forethought they put into their product's design refuses to admit that their product has a crucial design flaw in it then you have to wonder when the sting of being slapped in the face will wear off of its user community. And, more importantly, will they start to consider joining the ranks of those who decided that phones based on Google's Android operating system aren't so bad after all.

This is an especially critical question since Google started rolling out Android 2.2 (code named Froyo) to phones. Froyo is widely considered to be an extremely strong alternative to the iPhone and contains many features that iOS 4 does not.

Additionally, I have to wonder how Apple could have missed the "cover the corner and watch the reception go down the tubes" problem. Or, since they are claiming that a software bug is causing a higher number of bars to be displayed than what reflects reality, did they know about it but thought they could get away with it?

R&D: Our product has a significant flaw in it.
Sales: Who cares? We're on top of the world!
R&D: I'm not sure that is a good idea.
Sales: We're untouchable! No one will notice.
R&D: But people will feel betrayed.
Sales: Ha! What are they going to do? Leave us for another company?

Apple? No. Toyota.

Popular posts from this blog

So What is this IPaaS Stuff, Anyway?

 In my last post , I discussed how no-code/low-code platforms fulfill rapid development of business applications - addressing the needs of the Citizen Developer (a Gartner term  first used around 2009).  I also commented on how this specific objective limits their ability to provide true integration capabilities, which require the flexibility to adapt to the myriad variations of infrastructure.  This is a concern because companies often have acquired legacy systems via M&A activity while simultaneously investing in new technology solutions, resulting in a mishmash of systems with multiple ways of accessing them. In this post, I'd like to examine how the needs of the latter group are met by describing some key capabilities that are "must-haves" for any company looking to execute on a digital transformation strategy.  In order to do this, let's define who the target user base is for such a technology platform. Disclaimer:   I work for MuleSoft (a division...

It's Easier to Fail at DevOps than it is to Succeed

Slippery when wet Since the term DevOps was coined in Belgium back in 2009, it is impossible to avoid the term whether in discussions with colleagues or in professional trade magazines.  And during the years while this movement has gained momentum, many things have been written to describe what elements of a DevOps strategy are required for it to be successful. Yet in spite of this, there is an interesting data point worth noting: not many organizations feel there is a need for DevOps.  In a Gartner report entitled DevOps Adoption Survey Results (published in September 2015),  40%  of respondents said they had no plans to implement DevOps and 31% of respondents said they hadn't implemented it but planned to start in the 12 months after the survey was conducted. That left only 29% who had implemented DevOps in a pilot project or in production systems, which isn't a lot. "Maybe it's because there truly isn't a need for DevOps," you say.  While t...

COSMIC Insights

Consider the following scenario:  you're a mid-level manager and find out that a layoff is coming.  You're about too lose one of your best direct reports, but you have no ability to influence the decision to lay them off. Oy! My head hurts! What do you do? Oftentimes, I find that people - when presented with situations where they feel compelled to act but have no ability to change the outcome - enter a state of mental lethargy.  They don't know exactly what it is they should do but, "gosh darnit!", something has  to be done.  When they realize how helpless they actually are, they start lamenting about the situation, how they are backed into a corner, etc. In a very real sense, they go through the five stages of grief . I'd like to offer the following alternative way of approaching these and other situations:  I call it the COSMIC method, not only because it sounds cool but also because I like science fiction (" Lisan al Gaib! "). COSMIC is an acronym...