Skip to main content

Business Impact and Organizational Change Management

Last time we delved into the concept of business impact and defined it using the context of a journey from the "current state" to the "desired future state."  In this blog entry, we will gain a better understanding of why business impact is so important by looking at basic Organizational Chage Management (OCM) principles.  As a caveat, this will not be a comprehensive treatment of OCM by any means and will deviate from what the current methodologies prescribe.

Crawling to flying
OCM comes in two flavors, for the most part:

Kotter.  Developed by John Kotter, this is the direct result of his seminal book (published in 1996) entitled Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail.

Prosci.  Developed by Jeff Hiatt, this methodology is utilized by the company that he founded of the same name.

You can find a nice high-level comparison between Kotter and Prosci here.

There are others, of course, including an honorable mention of one of my favorite business-related books entitled Who Moved My Cheese? by Dr. Spencer Johnson. (This is a short book and a quick read, written in a format that's very engaging.  I highly recommend it.)

Here's where my explanation deviates significantly from what both Kotter and Prosci dictate.  OCM can be distilled into the following five-part method for establishing direction for a company at the Executive Leadership level.

  1. Strategic.  First, a set of strategic goals is identified with the intention of getting from the "current state" to the "desired future state," as we discussed last time.
  2. Tactical.  For each goal previously identified, an execution plan is created for the specific goal to be achieved.  This includes project timelines, deliverables, milestones, etc.
  3. People.  Next, the people who are best suited to lead each initiative in the previous step are tapped to lead.  These people are sometimes referred to as Program Managers.
  4. Process.  While the tactical plan is being executed, processes that are required to be created or changes to existing processes are identified, defined, and implemented.
  5. Technology.  Finally, enterprise software that is needed to support the new processes is evaluated and acquired.

The specific order of these five parts is important, because it highlights why the expression "no one ever bought software based on features alone" exists - any software purchase (5 in the list, above) that a company makes has to support the process changes (4) needed and being implemented by a team led by the Program Manager (3) based on the tactical plan (2) that was created to support the long-term strategic goals (1) of the business.  In other words, technology is the least important component of this equation.

Similarly, business impact (link goes to my previous blog entry on that topic) is the yardstick that measures whether or not a goal should be a Strategic Goal (capitalized for emphasis).  In other words, if the Executive Leadership Team cannot come to the conclusion that a specific goal has a high enough ROI (using the colloquial definition of the term and not the financial definition) then it won't be added to the strategic plan for the company.

Please note that we are discussing this in the context of the highest levels of a company, but these concepts can just as easily be leveraged at lower levels in a company, whether you are a Vice President, a Director or even a first-line Manager.

To summarize, business impact is the primary driver for most business decisions.  Understanding not only the concept but how to discuss it in conversational terms is not only crucial to determining what changes make sense in a professional setting but also critical to building consensus among your peers to support the changes you hope to implement.

Popular posts from this blog

It's Easier to Fail at DevOps than it is to Succeed

Slippery when wet Since the term DevOps was coined in Belgium back in 2009, it is impossible to avoid the term whether in discussions with colleagues or in professional trade magazines.  And during the years while this movement has gained momentum, many things have been written to describe what elements of a DevOps strategy are required for it to be successful. Yet in spite of this, there is an interesting data point worth noting: not many organizations feel there is a need for DevOps.  In a Gartner report entitled DevOps Adoption Survey Results (published in September 2015),  40%  of respondents said they had no plans to implement DevOps and 31% of respondents said they hadn't implemented it but planned to start in the 12 months after the survey was conducted. That left only 29% who had implemented DevOps in a pilot project or in production systems, which isn't a lot. "Maybe it's because there truly isn't a need for DevOps," you say.  While t...
Read more

So What is this IPaaS Stuff, Anyway?

 In my last post , I discussed how no-code/low-code platforms fulfill rapid development of business applications - addressing the needs of the Citizen Developer (a Gartner term  first used around 2009).  I also commented on how this specific objective limits their ability to provide true integration capabilities, which require the flexibility to adapt to the myriad variations of infrastructure.  This is a concern because companies often have acquired legacy systems via M&A activity while simultaneously investing in new technology solutions, resulting in a mishmash of systems with multiple ways of accessing them. In this post, I'd like to examine how the needs of the latter group are met by describing some key capabilities that are "must-haves" for any company looking to execute on a digital transformation strategy.  In order to do this, let's define who the target user base is for such a technology platform. Disclaimer:   I work for MuleSoft (a division...
Read more

Overcoming Imposter Syndrome

Imposter Syndrome is a cruel partner in your professional journey.  If you're not familiar with the term, it is essentially the feeling that you do not belong in a particular profession or that you do not deserve a specific role or set of responsibilities.  (You may read more in the Wikipedia article .)  I did not hear the term myself until I participated in a mentoring group for young employees at my current job - some of the young employees said they had this, and I won't deny a bit of surprise when I read what it is. If you feel this way, you're obviously not alone.  A good friend of mine suffers from this in no small amount in spite of the fact that she's an upper mid-level manager at her company with an organization of approximately 40 people reporting to her.  She feels this way because she never completed college, but fails to realize that her hard work and dedication to being the best that she can be is why she has been repeatedly promoted through the ra...
Read more