Skip to main content

Provisioning For What Purpose? (Part 1)

In the early part of the last decade, I ran a global education program at a mid-sized company called Softwatch.  In this role, my responsibilities required that I provide education to our partners around the world.  One such occasion had me traveling to Paris to teach a class with 20 students from various parts of Europe, and so my partner Matt Grob and I flew out on Saturday to spend the weekend creating a complete education lab from scratch.

Granted, it's not incredibly taxing when you're building a lab in Paris of all places.  The process, which was fairly straightforward, took us both days and then we had the nights to explore the Champs-Élysées, La Concorde, etc. not to mention eat and drink amazing culinary delights.

However, I digress.  The point I am trying to make is that it took us an entire weekend to build 20 computers in an identical manner.  It cost the company several hundred dollars to provide accommodations (hotel and meals) that would have been unnecessary if it were 2012 instead of 2002.

But it must be said that provisioning, for provisioning's sake, is never done - there is always a purpose. This task is performed to provide an environment that can run applications.  Maybe the applications are COTS (Commercial, Off The Shelf) or internally developed, but applications are the raison d'être.  Even in my story, we were building the machines so that my company's software could also be installed and run by the students during the class.

Provisioning, then, should be considered part of application release.

Many companies have missed the boat:  BMC's BladeLogic and CA's Automation Suite for Clouds are provisioning with no purpose.  They require other solutions to consume the produced machine, real or virtual, so that it may be incorporated into a bigger picture.  But customers no longer want building blocks - they want turn-key solutions - so these formerly bedrock solutions are now passé.  This is evidenced by the fact that both of these solutions are now buried deep within the websites of their respective owners.  I suspect similarly deep locations will be found on the websites of other vendors in this space.

Looking at the bigger picture, however, we see that provisioning is simply a sequence of steps to be followed:  
  1. Install the OS
  2. Install the application server, DBMS, or ESB
  3. Configure the application server, DBMS, or ESB
  4. Connect it to the rest of the infrastructure
  5. Deploy the application components on the box.  
The above steps define a process to be automated.

Automation is automation, regardless of how it's being used.  And all automation, regardless of its design, requires core capabilities that have withstood the test of time in terms of stability and scalability.

In part 2 we will look at some of these core capabilities that should be required features of any automation platform.

Popular posts from this blog

It's Easier to Fail at DevOps than it is to Succeed

Slippery when wet Since the term DevOps was coined in Belgium back in 2009, it is impossible to avoid the term whether in discussions with colleagues or in professional trade magazines.  And during the years while this movement has gained momentum, many things have been written to describe what elements of a DevOps strategy are required for it to be successful. Yet in spite of this, there is an interesting data point worth noting: not many organizations feel there is a need for DevOps.  In a Gartner report entitled DevOps Adoption Survey Results (published in September 2015),  40%  of respondents said they had no plans to implement DevOps and 31% of respondents said they hadn't implemented it but planned to start in the 12 months after the survey was conducted. That left only 29% who had implemented DevOps in a pilot project or in production systems, which isn't a lot. "Maybe it's because there truly isn't a need for DevOps," you say.  While t...

So What is this IPaaS Stuff, Anyway?

 In my last post , I discussed how no-code/low-code platforms fulfill rapid development of business applications - addressing the needs of the Citizen Developer (a Gartner term  first used around 2009).  I also commented on how this specific objective limits their ability to provide true integration capabilities, which require the flexibility to adapt to the myriad variations of infrastructure.  This is a concern because companies often have acquired legacy systems via M&A activity while simultaneously investing in new technology solutions, resulting in a mishmash of systems with multiple ways of accessing them. In this post, I'd like to examine how the needs of the latter group are met by describing some key capabilities that are "must-haves" for any company looking to execute on a digital transformation strategy.  In order to do this, let's define who the target user base is for such a technology platform. Disclaimer:   I work for MuleSoft (a division...

Overcoming Imposter Syndrome

Imposter Syndrome is a cruel partner in your professional journey.  If you're not familiar with the term, it is essentially the feeling that you do not belong in a particular profession or that you do not deserve a specific role or set of responsibilities.  (You may read more in the Wikipedia article .)  I did not hear the term myself until I participated in a mentoring group for young employees at my current job - some of the young employees said they had this, and I won't deny a bit of surprise when I read what it is. If you feel this way, you're obviously not alone.  A good friend of mine suffers from this in no small amount in spite of the fact that she's an upper mid-level manager at her company with an organization of approximately 40 people reporting to her.  She feels this way because she never completed college, but fails to realize that her hard work and dedication to being the best that she can be is why she has been repeatedly promoted through the ra...