Skip to main content

Mr. Change?

Ha! And you thought this entry was going to be about the sitting president. Actually, it's about me...or my blog rather.

You may have noticed a change in my blog. Specifically, the title has changed from its previous value to what it is now. The reason for the change came in the form of a Cease and Desist letter that I received on Friday in the mail claiming that I was improperly using a trademarked expression of the client of the law firm sending me the letter.

Google made it easy for me to see that the expression was indeed in use. Being the upstanding citizen that I am, I immediately changed the title of the blog and faxed over a response indicating that I was in compliance with their request. But then something funny happened...

...a number of years ago, I was jilted out of a substantial amount of money owed to me as an independent contractor by the company that placed me at the company where I was working. During the back and forth between the placement company and I, I contacted a cousin who is a lawyer for a prominent law firm who agreed to draw up a legal sounding letter based on what I told him. Even though what I said to him was in actuality true, he required no documentation proving it before writing the letter and mailing it to the other party.

Fast forward to the present: remembering how I got my cousin to send a letter as someone who claimed to be my legal representation, I wondered if something similar was happening here, i.e. not everything was "on the up and up." I visited the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and found out that the expression was indeed trademarked...but not by the business being represented by the law firm that sent me the letter.

In good faith, I am keeping the new title since a) a web search at the USPTO isn't a guarantee that the results are 100% accurate and b) someone owns the trademark whether it is company A or B. It isn't me, in any case. But I sent back a second letter tonight with a request for documentation supporting their claim, with the added statement that I may take legal action against them for "wrongful claim of infringement," recourse that is afforded people like me in situations just like this.

I have no problem with legal compliance. It is not my intention, after all, to use what is not mine or to cause possible harm to the brand of another company in these mindless wanderings that I call a blog. However, I do expect a minimum degree of honesty if you're going to demand anything of me and - as of this writing - it seems that minimum standard was not met. So en guarde Miss O'Conner because the ball is back in your court, and I've just upped the ante.

What does this have to do with business? The answer should be obvious, but here it is spelled out just in case.

There is nothing wrong with embellishing the truth to favor yourself. In fact, sales people often do just this, i.e. tell the truth without being accurate or while being intentionally misleading. I can remember one sales presentation where it was said "30% - 70% of your time is spent doing this." Hello? That's a 40% swing, and right in the middle of the Gaussian bell curve at that. What that message said was nothing short of pure bunk, but that's the fun of sales.

While it is expected in certain situations that you are going to view yourself with rose colored glasses, it is another matter entirely when you are going to try to claim something is true; that the government, your boss, your spouse, etc. is going to back you up; and you are lying. If the person calls your bluff - and they have every right to do so if you're making demands of them - then not only will your lie be exposed but you will have lost a huge amount of credibility.

Trust is not something that should be taken lightly, especially in a business sense. Toyota (a-Ha! I knew I could find a way to tie this in with the last two blog entries!) has found this out the hard way, but there's no reason why you should too.

Popular posts from this blog

It's Easier to Fail at DevOps than it is to Succeed

Slippery when wet Since the term DevOps was coined in Belgium back in 2009, it is impossible to avoid the term whether in discussions with colleagues or in professional trade magazines.  And during the years while this movement has gained momentum, many things have been written to describe what elements of a DevOps strategy are required for it to be successful. Yet in spite of this, there is an interesting data point worth noting: not many organizations feel there is a need for DevOps.  In a Gartner report entitled DevOps Adoption Survey Results (published in September 2015),  40%  of respondents said they had no plans to implement DevOps and 31% of respondents said they hadn't implemented it but planned to start in the 12 months after the survey was conducted. That left only 29% who had implemented DevOps in a pilot project or in production systems, which isn't a lot. "Maybe it's because there truly isn't a need for DevOps," you say.  While t...

So What is this IPaaS Stuff, Anyway?

 In my last post , I discussed how no-code/low-code platforms fulfill rapid development of business applications - addressing the needs of the Citizen Developer (a Gartner term  first used around 2009).  I also commented on how this specific objective limits their ability to provide true integration capabilities, which require the flexibility to adapt to the myriad variations of infrastructure.  This is a concern because companies often have acquired legacy systems via M&A activity while simultaneously investing in new technology solutions, resulting in a mishmash of systems with multiple ways of accessing them. In this post, I'd like to examine how the needs of the latter group are met by describing some key capabilities that are "must-haves" for any company looking to execute on a digital transformation strategy.  In order to do this, let's define who the target user base is for such a technology platform. Disclaimer:   I work for MuleSoft (a division...

Overcoming Imposter Syndrome

Imposter Syndrome is a cruel partner in your professional journey.  If you're not familiar with the term, it is essentially the feeling that you do not belong in a particular profession or that you do not deserve a specific role or set of responsibilities.  (You may read more in the Wikipedia article .)  I did not hear the term myself until I participated in a mentoring group for young employees at my current job - some of the young employees said they had this, and I won't deny a bit of surprise when I read what it is. If you feel this way, you're obviously not alone.  A good friend of mine suffers from this in no small amount in spite of the fact that she's an upper mid-level manager at her company with an organization of approximately 40 people reporting to her.  She feels this way because she never completed college, but fails to realize that her hard work and dedication to being the best that she can be is why she has been repeatedly promoted through the ra...