Skip to main content

Provisioning For What Purpose? (Part 1)

In the early part of the last decade, I ran a global education program at a mid-sized company called Softwatch.  In this role, my responsibilities required that I provide education to our partners around the world.  One such occasion had me traveling to Paris to teach a class with 20 students from various parts of Europe, and so my partner Matt Grob and I flew out on Saturday to spend the weekend creating a complete education lab from scratch.

Granted, it's not incredibly taxing when you're building a lab in Paris of all places.  The process, which was fairly straightforward, took us both days and then we had the nights to explore the Champs-Élysées, La Concorde, etc. not to mention eat and drink amazing culinary delights.

However, I digress.  The point I am trying to make is that it took us an entire weekend to build 20 computers in an identical manner.  It cost the company several hundred dollars to provide accommodations (hotel and meals) that would have been unnecessary if it were 2012 instead of 2002.

But it must be said that provisioning, for provisioning's sake, is never done - there is always a purpose. This task is performed to provide an environment that can run applications.  Maybe the applications are COTS (Commercial, Off The Shelf) or internally developed, but applications are the raison d'être.  Even in my story, we were building the machines so that my company's software could also be installed and run by the students during the class.

Provisioning, then, should be considered part of application release.

Many companies have missed the boat:  BMC's BladeLogic and CA's Automation Suite for Clouds are provisioning with no purpose.  They require other solutions to consume the produced machine, real or virtual, so that it may be incorporated into a bigger picture.  But customers no longer want building blocks - they want turn-key solutions - so these formerly bedrock solutions are now passé.  This is evidenced by the fact that both of these solutions are now buried deep within the websites of their respective owners.  I suspect similarly deep locations will be found on the websites of other vendors in this space.

Looking at the bigger picture, however, we see that provisioning is simply a sequence of steps to be followed:  
  1. Install the OS
  2. Install the application server, DBMS, or ESB
  3. Configure the application server, DBMS, or ESB
  4. Connect it to the rest of the infrastructure
  5. Deploy the application components on the box.  
The above steps define a process to be automated.

Automation is automation, regardless of how it's being used.  And all automation, regardless of its design, requires core capabilities that have withstood the test of time in terms of stability and scalability.

In part 2 we will look at some of these core capabilities that should be required features of any automation platform.

Popular posts from this blog

"Ni jiang yi yang de hua ma?"

Last week, I wrote about the necessity of having a clear message . Because this topic is so important I decided to follow-up with another entry on this general subject. This week we will approach it from another angle. (For the curious, the title says " Do you speak the same language? " in pinyin, which is a transliterated Mandarin Chinese.) Recently, a good friend of mine (who is Chinese, ironically) and I were playing pool. He had to bank the 8-ball in the pocket to win the game, and since it was an informal game and bank shots are my area of expertise, he asked me for advice. I told him, "you just need to strike the cue ball with medium speed so that it hits the 8-ball right in the middle." He didn't believe me so we marked the positions of the balls, and then he took his shot only to watch the 8-ball sail past the pocket. "A-ha!" he exclaimed. "I told you it wasn't that easy." But when we reset the positions and I made an attemp

It's Easier to Fail at DevOps than it is to Succeed

Slippery when wet Since the term DevOps was coined in Belgium back in 2009, it is impossible to avoid the term whether in discussions with colleagues or in professional trade magazines.  And during the years while this movement has gained momentum, many things have been written to describe what elements of a DevOps strategy are required for it to be successful. Yet in spite of this, there is an interesting data point worth noting: not many organizations feel there is a need for DevOps.  In a Gartner report entitled DevOps Adoption Survey Results (published in September 2015),  40%  of respondents said they had no plans to implement DevOps and 31% of respondents said they hadn't implemented it but planned to start in the 12 months after the survey was conducted. That left only 29% who had implemented DevOps in a pilot project or in production systems, which isn't a lot. "Maybe it's because there truly isn't a need for DevOps," you say.  While that

Is No/Low-Code the Key to IT Nirvana?

 Unless you've had your head in the sand for the past year or so, you've seen the phrases low-code  and no-code  bandied about quite frequently everywhere you look.  You've probably wondered if this is something new that's here to stay or just a "flash in the pan."  Although the terms have been in the fore of the IT trade publications recently, Low Code Development Platforms (LCDP) (and the corresponding No Code Development Platforms) have been in existence since 2011.  Their roots can be traced to the 90's with 4th generation programming languages and GUI-assisted programming paradigms, e.g. IBM VisualAge for Basic, which was discontinued in 1998. For those of you who aren't familiar with either, the premise is that these platforms allow someone to quickly build applications using a WYSIWYG interface and a "click and configure" paradigm to Isn't this the source code to Roblox? rapidly build full applications with little or no coding requ