Skip to main content

Credit Cards, Regulations, and You

Last Monday, new regulations went into effect that targeted the consumers of revolving credit accounts, a.k.a. credit cards. The idea went like this: make it harder for credit card companies to change their policies on a dime and you, Mr. / Mrs. Consumer, won't be so easily taken to the cleaners with fees, interest rates, etc.

As you probably know consumers still are getting taken to the cleaners because not only are their other ways for the credit card companies to maintain their well established revenue streams (read: us) but other things that they were lackadaisical in are no longer being treated with such apathy by the credit card companies.

So while it is mostly common sense, Sandra Block's article in USA Today listing the ways by which you can use the new regulations to maximize your benefit is quite timely. In her article, she writes as the number one thing you can do as paying off your balance...in its entirety.

My parents, as well as numerous other Americans, maintain a healthy credit card balance. For my parents, the balance lives in the 5-digit range, and this occasionally gets "paid off" via a HELOC (which only transfers the balance to a lower interest rate loan) before getting run up again. I was once like this, albeit with a smaller balance, until I was forced to learn how to live within my means by my ex-wife who is an accountant. It was painful to be sure, but 17 years later I swear by this mantra.

Has it been painful at times? Yes. When I married again, I had credit card bills that were in the 5 digit range, but I paid them off.

Has it been tempting to not pay them off completely? Yes. When I was unemployed last year for 7 months and still maintained a decent standard of living (read: I carried the same balance of $3,500 monthly) I was tempted at times to pay less.

Would I have done things differently now that I look back? No. And my FICO II score of nearly 800 - my Beacon 4.0 score is well over 800 - is the reason why. "What's the connection?" you ask. My claim is that it all boils down to one's mental approach, i.e. once you've accepted it as normal behavior to fall behind on what essentially is a financial obligation to pay back a monthly loan every month then you are just as likely to fall behind on other payments that you have to make. For me, those other payments were a mortgage, homeowner's association fees (not insubstantial), car payments and associated insurance, etc.

And then there is the apartment lease for our current residence as well as a vehicle lease since my wife's previous lease expired. "Why," you ask again, "are you getting a lease for your wife?"

A few years ago, before we were married, she became terribly ill and spent several days in the hospital. As an entrepreneur, she had no medical insurance and quickly amassed medical bills nearing $200,000. She had no choice, as you can imagine, but to declare personal bankruptcy, which absolutely destroyed any vestiges of a credit score. Now she cannot get a loan of any type because of this.

In other words, we know what financial pain is like even though no one has ever adequately expressed the frustration one feels when they can't get a loan for an automobile, a necessity in today's world unless you happen to live in Manhattan or a metropolitan area with a similar mass transit system.

The moral of this story is that it's less about the paying off of your credit card to avoid seemingly random interest rate hikes (prior to the new regulations taking effect) or other unusual fees that can crop up and more about establishing a mental attitude toward fiscal responsibility. It is taking this approach to one's life that can really be a game changer, since there are innumerable repercussions of which you and I will never be totally aware like being able to maintain an insanely high credit score when you need it most.

Popular posts from this blog

"Ni jiang yi yang de hua ma?"

Last week, I wrote about the necessity of having a clear message . Because this topic is so important I decided to follow-up with another entry on this general subject. This week we will approach it from another angle. (For the curious, the title says " Do you speak the same language? " in pinyin, which is a transliterated Mandarin Chinese.) Recently, a good friend of mine (who is Chinese, ironically) and I were playing pool. He had to bank the 8-ball in the pocket to win the game, and since it was an informal game and bank shots are my area of expertise, he asked me for advice. I told him, "you just need to strike the cue ball with medium speed so that it hits the 8-ball right in the middle." He didn't believe me so we marked the positions of the balls, and then he took his shot only to watch the 8-ball sail past the pocket. "A-ha!" he exclaimed. "I told you it wasn't that easy." But when we reset the positions and I made an attemp

It's Easier to Fail at DevOps than it is to Succeed

Slippery when wet Since the term DevOps was coined in Belgium back in 2009, it is impossible to avoid the term whether in discussions with colleagues or in professional trade magazines.  And during the years while this movement has gained momentum, many things have been written to describe what elements of a DevOps strategy are required for it to be successful. Yet in spite of this, there is an interesting data point worth noting: not many organizations feel there is a need for DevOps.  In a Gartner report entitled DevOps Adoption Survey Results (published in September 2015),  40%  of respondents said they had no plans to implement DevOps and 31% of respondents said they hadn't implemented it but planned to start in the 12 months after the survey was conducted. That left only 29% who had implemented DevOps in a pilot project or in production systems, which isn't a lot. "Maybe it's because there truly isn't a need for DevOps," you say.  While that

Is No/Low-Code the Key to IT Nirvana?

 Unless you've had your head in the sand for the past year or so, you've seen the phrases low-code  and no-code  bandied about quite frequently everywhere you look.  You've probably wondered if this is something new that's here to stay or just a "flash in the pan."  Although the terms have been in the fore of the IT trade publications recently, Low Code Development Platforms (LCDP) (and the corresponding No Code Development Platforms) have been in existence since 2011.  Their roots can be traced to the 90's with 4th generation programming languages and GUI-assisted programming paradigms, e.g. IBM VisualAge for Basic, which was discontinued in 1998. For those of you who aren't familiar with either, the premise is that these platforms allow someone to quickly build applications using a WYSIWYG interface and a "click and configure" paradigm to Isn't this the source code to Roblox? rapidly build full applications with little or no coding requ