Skip to main content

Have an Idea? Act on it!

Occasionally, I'm reminded of how things could have turned out. ("I cudda been a contendah!") If you know me in real life then you know that, while I'm not against taking risks, they are always calculated to the nth degree and weighed against the effort required to achieve whatever goal I am thinking about. And so I dream up a lot of ideas for products or services (some good and some not), realize that I would prefer to relax during my off-time, and then shelve the ideas.

Inevitably, at some point soon after shelving an idea I look at the entrepreneurs of the world or even some homegrown ones and wonder how they ended up being multi-millionaires when I am not. I even asked one how it happened. He said to me (paraphrased), "it's easy to take risks if you have nothing to lose." I suppose the problem is that I've always been mildly successful so I've never felt the need to reach for the proverbial brass ring.

Should I have? You be the judge:
  • In 1991, Jason Crawford and I were sent from IBM's T. J. Watson Research Center to IBM's Boca Raton facility to help out for a month on the OS/2 2.0 product launch. Jason, being frustrated that he couldn't check his work email, thought of the idea of logging in to his desktop remotely to do so. We both worked independently of each other, but both gave up because the speed (or lack thereof) of the networks made testing and debugging a nightmare.
  • In the late 1980's as I was finishing up my Computer Science degree, I thought of going after my Master's degree using an idiomatic programming language as my project and basis for my thesis. Drag and drop icons here and there on a white slate, draw some connections to represent program flow and branch logic, and anyone can write a computer program.
Do these sound familiar? They should. The first example is identical to pcAnywhere which was hugely popular during its heyday in the late 90's and generated a lot of money for Symantec. The second example is akin to HP's OpsWare, BMC's RealOps (now Atrium Orchestrator), or CA's Process Automation Manager products. OpWare was acquired by HP in 2007 for USD$1.6B in cash; I don't have figures for the other two products but I don't think that it matters after you've read one point six billion dollars.

Where would I be financially if I had acted? Risk is not without its rewards as the OpsWare payout demonstrates quite nicely. Do you have an idea? Let me quote Rudyard Kiping:

"Something hidden. Go and find it. Go and look behind the Ranges -- Something lost behind the Ranges. Lost and waiting for you. Go!"

"The Ranges" can be anything that is blocking you from achieving your goals or desires. Don't let them get in your way or, worse, become something they aren't. We commonly hear this as "making a mountain out of a molehill," or put another way "it's only a problem if you let it become a problem."

Popular posts from this blog

"Ni jiang yi yang de hua ma?"

Last week, I wrote about the necessity of having a clear message . Because this topic is so important I decided to follow-up with another entry on this general subject. This week we will approach it from another angle. (For the curious, the title says " Do you speak the same language? " in pinyin, which is a transliterated Mandarin Chinese.) Recently, a good friend of mine (who is Chinese, ironically) and I were playing pool. He had to bank the 8-ball in the pocket to win the game, and since it was an informal game and bank shots are my area of expertise, he asked me for advice. I told him, "you just need to strike the cue ball with medium speed so that it hits the 8-ball right in the middle." He didn't believe me so we marked the positions of the balls, and then he took his shot only to watch the 8-ball sail past the pocket. "A-ha!" he exclaimed. "I told you it wasn't that easy." But when we reset the positions and I made an attemp

It's Easier to Fail at DevOps than it is to Succeed

Slippery when wet Since the term DevOps was coined in Belgium back in 2009, it is impossible to avoid the term whether in discussions with colleagues or in professional trade magazines.  And during the years while this movement has gained momentum, many things have been written to describe what elements of a DevOps strategy are required for it to be successful. Yet in spite of this, there is an interesting data point worth noting: not many organizations feel there is a need for DevOps.  In a Gartner report entitled DevOps Adoption Survey Results (published in September 2015),  40%  of respondents said they had no plans to implement DevOps and 31% of respondents said they hadn't implemented it but planned to start in the 12 months after the survey was conducted. That left only 29% who had implemented DevOps in a pilot project or in production systems, which isn't a lot. "Maybe it's because there truly isn't a need for DevOps," you say.  While that

Is No/Low-Code the Key to IT Nirvana?

 Unless you've had your head in the sand for the past year or so, you've seen the phrases low-code  and no-code  bandied about quite frequently everywhere you look.  You've probably wondered if this is something new that's here to stay or just a "flash in the pan."  Although the terms have been in the fore of the IT trade publications recently, Low Code Development Platforms (LCDP) (and the corresponding No Code Development Platforms) have been in existence since 2011.  Their roots can be traced to the 90's with 4th generation programming languages and GUI-assisted programming paradigms, e.g. IBM VisualAge for Basic, which was discontinued in 1998. For those of you who aren't familiar with either, the premise is that these platforms allow someone to quickly build applications using a WYSIWYG interface and a "click and configure" paradigm to Isn't this the source code to Roblox? rapidly build full applications with little or no coding requ